In A League of His Own

All in all, it was a good weekend, despite Audrey being away for a family visit down south. I had plans to have friends over Saturday night to watch the Australian GP with Glory and I, and a crock pot meal to simmer whilst I did other things during the day.

But when I removed the seasoning package from the cupboard Saturday morning, I wondered just how long it had lingered there, and whether envelope food even has a best before date - turns out it does indeed:

🤯

I made this discovery a little after 9 am, and with an 8 hour cook time (because fast cooking in a slow cooker seems pointless to me), I dashed out to the grocery store immediately but discovered shortly after arrival that they do no make that package any more, or at least my neighbourhood Save-On does not carry it.

"Well that's just great," I thought to myself. "I already have all the other ingredients and time's a-wastin' - what am I supposed to do now?"

(Does anyone else ever have those moments where your own mind or self or consciousness somehow speaks to you directly and pull you up short? If not, buckle up.)

A voice inside my head, audibly exasperated, spoke with crystal clarity, saying "are you serious? what kind of chucklehead makes stir-fry in a slow cooker in the first place? just buy the sauce, dumbass."

Shocked and chastened but in complete agreement, I did exactly that and dinner was saved - and quite tasty to boot.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

That evening four of us sat down to watch the first Grand Prix of the Formula 1 season, in Australia. Yes, Glory's sudden onset interest in this sport has not abated and I continue down the rabbit hole after her.

This year the four of us entered the F1 fantasy league, which allows to pick a team of five drivers and two constructors under a set budget of $100M. The top drivers and constructors are all $20M+ so judicious selection is critical - seven average picks, or carve out the middle with one ace driver and several ho-hums?

As a newbie who is kept in the loop primarily by his daughter and her TikTok intake, I thought there was merit in nabbing the lead driver for Mercedes, George Russell. Full disclosure, I like his teammate Kimi Antonelli more (friggin' kid is adorable), but George gives great radio and is being tipped to have quite a season. And with the Mercedes car provoking other teams to call them cheaters, that seemed like a good team to pick, despite the expense.

This didn't leave me a lot of money left for the other five slots, but I got it rounded out eventually, and loecked in about an hour before qualifying and the cutoff for entries. My picks were based more on drivers I want to do well who fit in my budget as opposed to my hopes for their season, but I got this year's rookie, Arvid Lindblad, who is clearly just giddy to be there (like Kimi last year).

The new car construction rules (or "formula") have been a challenge for most teams and many drivers are unsure or downright skeptical, but I will say it was an exciting race with a lot of overtaking, and a solid finish for Ferrari who had a rather terrible 2025 season. 

My boy George took first place (which was great as I doubled down on him for points), and his teammate Kimi getting second was great for my constructor points.

Feeling smug, I was shocked to check our 4-person league standings today and learn that Glory had snaked me by 20 points!

Despite finishing in P6, her main driver Max Verstappen had earned 100 points compared to George's 79.

This is because you get points in the league for more than just final position; points for having the fastest lap, for overtaking positions, and in his case, winning the Driver of the Day poll (normally 10 points, but worth 20 from Glory doubling down on him).

When I complained in our group chat about this unexpected change in positions, her response was unequivocable, direct, and completely consistent with her personality:

"Get wrecked"

Ah well, perhaps the Shanghai results next week will turn out better for me.

The Hard Times

Let us pause in life's pleasures and count its many tears,
While we all sup sorrow with the poor;
There's a song that will linger forever in our ears;
Oh! Hard times come again no more.

-Stephen Foster

When I was in 8th grade, there was a social studies unit that begins with an audio drama depicting how you and your classmates are on a field trip visiting a military base when the signs begin blaring because war - presumably nuclear - has broken out. The students are quickly put onto a transport plane to be evacuated, but crash land on an island with flora, fauna and climate more akin to the South Pacific than anywhere in Canadian territory. With no supervision you must organize, gather resources and creat your own small scale society until rescue comes, if it ever does.

Other than the discovery of breadfruit as a potential food source, I remember very little of that unit, but that opening will stick with me. The wail of the alarm did not sound all the different from the repurposed civil defense siren at Alexandra Arena that sounded the ten pm curfew every night. Even as children, we were constantly reminded of the threat of WWIII: the notion that the DEW line might be our only warning that Soviet ICBMs were enroute over the North Pole, Audrey being directed to hide under a playground slide during a drill, countless "what if" scenarios played out on screens big and small as well as pages far and wide.

After the fall of the Berlin Wall and the dissolution of the Soviet Union though, there was much less worry about such global conflict. Sure, the Peoples Republic of China emerged as a new "near peer adversary" and then Russia re-asserted itself as a global and malign actor, but there have always been other pressing things to worry about. Global conflict has never been as significant a concern to my adult self as it seemed to be in my adolescence, and I never, never took that air of peace in my own backyard for granted. 

I mean, up until recently.

• In 2022, Russia invaded the eastern border of Ukraine in a "Special Military Operation" (e.g. war) that somehow persists to this very day (Slava Ukraini!)
• European nations, while not committing troops to the fight, are only two willing to help supply Ukraine where it can with jet fighters, ammunition and armoured vehicles, and Finland and Sweden have even joined NATO subsequently.
• China also weaponized its extended coastline that it built up into the South China Sea in 2022, effectively narrowing the aperture through which international ships may pass without entering coastal waters
• The current U.S. administration, disregarding treaties and internationl laws that inconvenience it in any way, have launched attacks with no congressional approval on the leadership of Venezuela, and as of two days ago, joined Israel in launching long range atacks on Iran (again, without a declaration of war or congressional approval).
• Iran, having sustained not only the death of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khameini but possible mass civilian casualties due to a school strike, is now lashing out with attacks across the Middle East (Israel, Bahrain, U.A.E., Qatar, Kuwait, Iraw and Jordan).

So, geopolitically at least, I think it is fair to say things have destabilized significantly over the past decade or so.

Meanwhile in my home province of Alberta, health care and education are failing due to mismanagement by the UCP government (e.g. 11,000 acute care beds in the '90s compared to 8,800 now, despite the population going from <3 million to over 5 million in that period); whether this is due to incompetence, callousness, active cruelty or ruthless pursuit of privatization is up for debate, but not to me.

This same government has taken no stance against the separatist movement in Alberta, a movement whose senior figures which has also claimed to have met with senior U.S. officials to discuss loans, trade treaties and even potential military support.

With that same UCP government now trying to blame immigrants for the 9.4B dollar deficit they have wrought with a really problematic set of referendum questions this fall and taking steps to transition our Sherrifs into a police force that the majority of citizens and  municipalities have made clear they don't want, many outraged Albertans calling for an election, which seems unlikely to happen.

So, yeah, all in all, between the stuff happening at home and ICE killing and beating up Americans in Democratic cities like Minneapolis, and armed conflicts increasing in multiple theatres across the globe, it is all looking a little too 1930s around here for my tastes.

Bad actors (despots, wanna-be dictators, monarchs-in-waiting and billionaire oligarchs) all seem intent on making things tough for ordinary people worldwide and it feels like things might get worse before they get better.

Even now, however, it is critical that we not give up hope.

Continue to pay attention, to speak up, to call out unjust and illegal behaviour when you see it. 

Remember that despite their power, some of these individuals are objectively stupid, like whoever decided to host a strategic military session in a curtained off area of a resort.

And times may indeed get tough, but humanity has shown an amazing ability to weather hard times - hell, look at Ukraine! Do what you can to prepare before hardships arrive.When they do, help your nieghbour where you can, so they will help you and others in turn. Community will always endure. 

I don't like the felling in the pit of my stomach, and if I hear a civil defense siren outside, even as a drill, even in jest, I will die inside just a little. 

But regardless of your belief, have faith in the wisdom of these words: "This too, shall pass."

'Tis the song, the sigh of the weary,
Hard Times, hard times, come again no more.
Many days you have lingered around my cabin door;
Oh! Hard times come again no more.

Silvering To Victory

Like a lot of Canadians, Audrey and I got up before 6 am this morning so we could watch the gold medal hockey game against Team USA.

So, like many Canadians, in addition to being sleep deprived, I am saddened, frustated and yeah, disappointed.

Not with our team - heavens no!

Without their injured captain and gold medal hero Sidney Crosby, they still played their guts out, tying the game, penalty killing a 4-minute major, shelling the American goalie (who played supernaturally well!) with nearly twice as many shots as their opponents in the 2nd and 3rd periods, but ultimately losing early in the 3-on-3 overtime period (which, by the way: why?!).

"We did everything but score," a crestfallen player said. What more could we have asked of them?

On social media, many Canadian sports fans credited the USA with playing a good, hard game, and thanked our side for a tremendous effort, but I am sure this outcome will rest on their spirits for years to come.

And sure, some Canucks pointed fingers at uncalled penalties, but my frustration didn't stem from them:

 

Disheartening stuff to be sure, and I am confident that there are people who find the stuff above amusing, gratifying and all part of the game.

But I think these laughs have a very low return on investment. Magnanimity feels like a lot to ask for in our currently heated environment, at least in some quarters. But I truly believe the overhead costs on hubris and arrogance will be debilitating in the long term. 

Seeing well-wishers from Finland (who we beat to get to the final), Great Britain (who we'd beaten in men's curling that very morning) and even some from the United States prior even to the puck being dropped, gave me a little consolation in the wake of the gloating and sneering that small-minded folks find preferable.

Canadian playwright Christopher Earle is quoted as saying, "Be humble in victory, and gracious in defeat." There is no second part to this aphorism or epigram; no promised reward or surety that goes with it. It doesn't promise good luck or to keep the doctor away or to make the practitioner healthy, wealthy and wise. Perhaps that is the point of it, actually.

In truth though, what it does is nurture relationships, and build community. It reduces division, something that many people rely upon to make the world continue running in an established pattern.

And while that promise might not be as flashy or alluring as gold, it has the shine and purity of silver, which makes it covetable (and accessible!) to that many more people!

Unprayed

I don't go to church to be disappointed in myself but it happens from time to time. Usually it is when I am reminded of the tenets of my faith and missed opportunities to apply them better, and during this past Sunday's service, that is what happened.

Most of the service was as one might expect: scriptures were read, songs were sung, and prayers were delivered. During our service, there is an opportunity to light candles of concern or celebration. Two were lit for congregations in our regions, one was lit for the death of a friend, and another was lit for the birth of a great-grandson. Of course someone lit one for the dead in Tumbler Ridge and that whole community, wishing them swift healing from the trauma their community endured. I thought about going up, but wrestled with the idea for too long and the moment was lost. 

I had first had the notion when we passed the peace at the start of the service, shaking hands with other people in the congregation and asking that the peace of Christ be with them. I shook hands with Madeline, a trans woman who started attending last fall with her partner Diamond. I know people in that community have experienced even more expressions of hatred since it was revealed that the Tumbler Ridge shooter was a trans individual, and I told Madeline I was glad to see them.

Then I shook hands with Nicole and Danielle, the couple who joined us as full members about a year ago through profession of faith, and who now look after the supplies for the post-service-fellowship. They are sweethearts and I am always delighted to see them.

But it got me thinking about the communities of faith where the four of them might not be welcome, and the unspoken prayer began to form.

A little while later we got to our reflection, which was not a sermon per se, but a brief talk by the guest invited by our Outreach Committee: Samuel Juru, the executive director of the Newcomer Centre (which was formerly called the Mennonite Center for Newcomers).

He spoke about his experiences growing up in Zimbabwe and being visited by armed government agents there after questioning those in power in a televised Q&A while a student. About coming to Canada as a political refugee, and how his first job here, despite having a degree in international relations, was unloading trucks on the nightshift.

Despite the fact that many other immigrants and refugees in his circle felt having a decent paying job and an apartment meant he had "made it", he reflected on what he wanted to do with his life, returned to school and started two decades of public service helping those trying to come to Canada to make it a better place.

It was a wonderfully personal and inspirational story, that had less to do with faith (although he related praying to God to give him Samson's strength on his first night of unloading heavy, tube-style televisions) and more to do with values, and maybe that is when it hit me:

How many of my fellow Albertans would have been indignat or even angered by the things that brought me joy that morning?

Shaking hands with a transgender woman? Greeting a lesbian couple? Listening to a black immigrant share his story about not only making a successful life with a family here in Canada but helping others to do the same?

It feels like I am continually reading the amplified grievances of people lamenting the way things "used to be," which, let's face it, were probably a pretty good time for white Christian males...but not a lot of others. 

This seems to be the banner that the Alberta separacists (no, I believe that is spelled correctly) are trying to draw people to, and in that moment of realization, a few things came into sharp focus to me:

1) sometimes, the simple act of being a wholly inclusive community of faith and providing a safe space for people is enough in itself, and

2) that being a welcoming and justice-oriented organization is going to feel threatening to some people, and

3) that impasse will be difficult, if not impossible to bridge in our current environment, and we should ask for help.

As people lined up to ask for prayers of both joy and concern, I recognized that what I should do, what I ought to say, is to go up, and highlight that impasse, and then pray - not for us but for the haters.

Pray that the Divine opens their eyes, or their minds, or their hearts, whatever requires broaching. Ask them to see a world that celebrates differences instead of fearing it, to imagine one that embraces diversity as a source of strength and not dilution. Because as entrenched as our positions might seem to be, we won't be able to move forward effectively without some of those on the other side changing their minds.

And with corporate-owned news media and billionaire-owned social media so intent on keeping us divided and antagonistic for eyes and subscriptions and likes and clicks and advertising dollars , the oligarchs and the rest of them can sit back and watch us divide ourselves, and then roll up to conquer later on.

All of this ran through my head as I struggled to pay attention to the other candle-lighters asking for prayers, but when the last one spoke, I was still there, in my seat. Unwilling to stand and make this ridiculous ask that we, as followers of not just the 'brand' but the actual teachings of Jesus, try to find it in ourselves to recognize the intolerant as fellow children of God.

And what has gnawed at my soul since then is not so much the fact that I was unable to do it; the real pain is the lack of regret I feel for not having done it.

Perhaps next Sunday...

You-Know-Who Off the Starboard Bow

I am willing to wager that, in 1985, the nerdiest group at Leduc Composite High School was probably our Star Trek game club.

Sure, we would get together over lunch to play the excellent Star Trek role-playing game FASA produced, similar to the D&D club. But one of the best parts of the deluxe boxed set I had splurged on was that it not only came with all the RPG rules, character sheets and a book of scenarios, oh no. It also came with their Starship Tactical Combat system, a good-sized hex map and a set of counters.

This was my favourite space combat system for years; fast, elegant, and fun to play, with a dizzying array of spaceships to choose from in a great collection of sourcebooks. 

Best of all though, in addition to allowing players to command individual or groups of ships, it came with a set of helm displays so that each RPG character could control their own bridge station: the captain would give their orders and general plan, the engineer would allocate power to movement, weapons and shields, and three different crew would then execute the orders as best they could, based on energy allotment, dice rolls and enemy action.

Before beginning our campaign in earnest, we thought it a good idea to try a simulator session to familiarize ourselves with the system, a la Kobayashi Maru. The Constitution class was a bit overgunned for the classic Klingon D7, so as the gamemaster I ran a D10 heavy battlecruiser as OpFor and we set the two vessels up facing each other a good ways apart. 

In space games there is not a lot of terrain to contend with, so most engagements start out looking like a game of chicken. As I recall, the turns were broken into segments, and the more energy you had allocated to movement, the more segments you would move on. Once per turn, you could choose to fire any powered-up weapons in the correct firing arc (such as port, forward, aft, etc.).

I did my best not to listen in on their plans, as that would be both unfair and unrealistic - after all, how would the Klingons overhear enemy bridge chatter which was such a key part of the Trek canon? And besides that, I already had a fairly significant advantage.

What? Gawd, no, not any sort of tactical genius (snort) - ask anyone who's played me. No, my advantage was made crystal clear as Capt. Earl asked his crew for tactical input and they made a variety of cases for him to consider. My Klingons, meanwhile, had perfect communication and execution as their entire bridge complement (and everyone else for that matter) were all controlled by a single player - me.

After taking some ineffectual long range shots at one another, the Federation ship (whose name Earl and I believe was the USS Excalibur) and Riska

dh class battlecruiser closed to knife-fighting range. The Excalibur had reduced movement to intensify their forward firepower and shields, while I...had not.

"Helm, bring us straight in. Weapons, hold fire until point blank range," Capt. Earl ordered as he leaned forward in his desk. Each segment, the two warships moved closer and closer to each other. "Almost there..." he murmured - just before the segment arrived for my double-move and I skipped the D10 directly over the Excalibur and into the hex directly behind it.

Now, at that time, in that system, the Constitution class had absolutely no aft-firing weapons.

The D10 did, though. 

Not big ones, just two small disruptor batteries. However, if one had not allocated any real power to the aft shields because they'd reinforced the front, any disruptors at all are bad news, particularly at point blank range.

The Excalibur was rocked with structural and systems damage, but nowhere near out of the fight - a wounded and cornered animal, more than capable of evening the odds.

Frustrated and disappointed but his composure uncracked, Capt. Earl gave his orders: "Damage control parties to all decks. Arm photon torpedoes! Bring us around and let them have both barrels before they can pull out of range and make another pass."

The Excalibur's damaged state did not give them any spare energy to speak of, so movement would need to be slow in order to allow sufficient power to the weapons and forward shields. AS the segments counted down, they finally and painstakingly turned a single hex face, while the D10 had not yet moved. 

A few more segments and then another turn in place...one more turn and the photon torpedoes would have a bead on the Klingon ship! Even if I had reinforced my rear shields, they could not possibly withstand such an onslaught. 

As it happened though, I had not allocated any power to my rear shields at all.

Finally, they used their last remaining movement point to turn the final hex face and point their incredibly dangerous nose towards my Klingon's exposed backside. 

But in that final segment I also got to move, and having remained still for an entire turn, was now permitted to move straight backwards two hexes. Which I did! And which brought my own panoply of now-overcharged weapons directly to bear on the familiar and still unshielded aft facing of the Excalibur.

There was a low moan from several of the crew as I collected all the dice I needed and let fly. With no shields to blunt the disruptors' assailment the Excalibur's systems were demolished and the superstructure was irreparably damaged. 

Crestfallen, the crew looked to Captain Earl, who gave the only orders he still could: "All hands - abandon ship. I say again abandon ship. All crew to the escape pods. Comms, launch a signal buoy with our position and distress beacon..."

After a moment, I said, "well, good thing this was a simulation, right? There is no way you will let me get away with that nonsense next time!"

In fact, as I recall it, there was enough time to get a rematch in during that same lunch period, and the Excalibur's now-seasoned crew made a much better showing.

Still, the look on their faces when I moved backwards to attack them from behind a second time still makes me smile four decades later.

The Revolution *Will* Be Dramatised - One Battle After Another, Reviewed

Prior to the Oscars, our household always tries to scarf down as many films with as many nominees as we can. Sometimes we encounter a delight we might not have come across otherwise, and other times these viewings feel obligatory or perfunctory, even after the fact. When we started watching Paul Thomas Anderson's One Battle After Another tonight I approached it like the latter, but was pleasantly surprised to discover the former.

I knew from the trailer that I was in for something conspiratorial and paranoid, but there is an almost hallucinatory or dreamlike element to much of it as well that reminded me of The Illuminatus Trilogy. The compartmentalized secrecy of the French 75 revolutionary group, while hearkening back to the Weather Underground of the 60s and 70s, felt chronologically displaced among modern autos and cell phones. It was even filmed in 35mm VistaVision for a more period feel.

The majority of the film follows a former revolutionary (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his teenaged daughter (Chase Infiniti) who go on the run after 16 years in hiding when a vengeful Col. Lockjaw (Sean Penn) discovers their whereabouts. This partially follows the plot of Thomas Pynchon's novel Vineland but is only a loose adaptation (with the author's blessing, which is cool).

The writing is tight and the pacing tighter than most of the other Anderson movie's I've watched (I appreciated There Will be Blood but actively disliked Phantom Thread), but like those movies there are some fantastic performances to be had here, running the gamut from broad satire to intensely personal. Benicio Del Toro joins the other two male leads for Oscar nominations and I adored his portrayal of a karate school teacher who maintains an unbreakable coolness despite the plot's impacts on his own, separate, clandestine objectives.

The lack of female nominations strikes me as tragic, given the caliber of performances, but 13 nominations for the film in total is no small achievement.

In terms of impact, it is one thing for a present day movie to echo the sentiments of a more subversive era, with its callbacks to Gil Scott Heron's The Revolution Will Not Be Televised and the film The Battle of Algiers (mandatory viewing for both the Black Panthers and the FBI's Hostage Rescue Unit) while people are weariung present day clothing. It is entirely another to watch Federal agents kitted out in full tactical gear storming a frozen food factory and high school dance as cover for their manhunt, using agents provocateur to escalate street confrontations while similar scenes are playing out IRL in Minneapolis. 

The introduction of an even more secretive faction of rich white racists brings things like the Epstein files to mind as well - all this from a screenplay Anderson says he has been writing for twenty years, and which wrapped shooting a year before the ICE surge descended on Minnesota.

An imaginative and chilling movie that has genuine affection for the characters that it subjects to such harsh trials, and yet still finds moments of gallows humour and absurdity, I suggest open-minded film fans seek out One Battle After Another on Crave here in Canada. Heck, if you watch Sinners on the same service, that's 29 nominations you've covered for the Oscars...

Shoresy: A True and Vulgar Heart

The opening scene of the hockey comedy Shoresy (just wrapping up its fifth season on Crave and starting it stateside on Hulu in February) is an imaginary sports panel podcast that does a seamless job summing up both the titular character and the show itself:

1) Shoresy himself (Jared Keeso, co-creator and writer), who plays AA hockey in Sudbury, is a likely candidate for the dirtiest player in all of hockey, both on and off the ice, and

2) he also has a big, sentimental heart (exemplified by his crying every time he hears the national anthem), and visibly choking up on a few key moments even in the first season.

Having really enjoyed Keeso's breakout project Letterkenny, I don't rightly know why I slept so long on Shoresy. We got three months worth of Crave in January so we could watch season two of The Pitt and Knight of Seven Kingdoms, but when I was laid up after my molar extraction, it seemed a perfect opportunity to watch a show Glory had already seen and was confident I would like.

Two days later I had watched three of the five available seasons.

I am not surprised that I like it so much; it has the same rough, swear-y exterior and genuine warmth underneath that Letterkenny does, but exploring longer stories among a great supporting cast of colourful characters makes it even better, in my opinion. And while it isn't always funny, the smartness of the dialogue and laugh density is just tremendous.

What did surprise me was how much Audrey and Fenya enjoyed it, as I thought the rapid-fire, slang and expletive-filled dialogue would be too much for them. And Shoresy himself is by no means a 'good' guy - for most of the first couple seasons he is actually more like an anti-hero, a loose cannon you are happy to see directed at worse people or achieving collective good incidentally.

And yet, when Keeso brilliantly portrays Shoresy's resistance to genuine emotion in the first season finale, Fenya observed, "it is just ridiculous to me that an episode that opened with a crude sexual reference and literal poop humor can contain such genuine sentiment - how?!"

Regardless of how, we are all now die-hard fans of the show and the Sudbury Blueberry Bulldogs - enough so that three of us and Glory's bestie went to see the Shoresy Classic on Friday night.

Since everyone who skates on the show has real hockey experience (including a 7th overall draft pick and one with three Stanley Cup rings), they've started challenging NHL alumni teams to short games with part of the proceeds going to charity. Getting to see Goody, Hitch, Dolo, the Jims and the rest lace them up against the likes of Ales Hemsky, Georges Laraques, Fernando Pisani et al was a real treat, as was watching Keeso referee an Atoms game of 6-8 year-olds during the intermission.

It isn't great video but I had to share the beauty hotdog goal scored by Jacob "Fish" Smith in the shootout that began the second period.

The Bulldogs haven't won any of these games yet (they tied the Bruins 14 all), but despite losing 13-11 in Edmonton, they put 12,000 bums in seats (3.5K more than Cowtown!), raised $46,000 for the Oilers Community Foundation, and, as promised, skated a hard lap with their tarps off "for the broads."

After the game, Jonathan Ismael Diaby (Dolo) announced an after-party at Beercade on Whyte Ave (a venue choice that another fan described as "on-brand") that Glory and Fenya ended up going to, and where Glory ended up getting gifted a shot from Dolo himself, which was pretty cool.

To be clear, Shoresy is not a show for the easily offended, or maybe even one tier up from that, whatever you might call it. But behind the rude language and occasional objectification there is a sincere show with a lot of heart that has a lot to say about teamwork and perseverance sure, but also about community and personal growth. Maybe sacrifice too, since the handsome male lead had a tooth surgically removed to legitimize his hockey smile. It also shares Letterkenny's great knack for fast, smart dialogue and intriguing characters. 

And oh man, whatever the opposite of toxic masculinity is, as exemplified in this promo for the most recent season:

Plus solid and organic indigenous representation, strong female characters and plenty of references just for us noth of 49ers. Shoresy is great CanCon and a full season of six 20+ minute episodes is about the same time commitment as a movie; check it out if you get an opportunity.